Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
R.C.P. No.77/2023

Case between T.R. Santhi vs Priya M.R. regarding Rent Control

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2024-07-31
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioner, T.R. Santhi, is seeking possession of a rented building from the respondent, Priya M.R., who has surrendered the property. The petition was dismissed as not pressed after the respondent vacated the premises.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the rent control petition as not pressed since the respondent surrendered the vacant possession of the petition schedule building.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the rent control petition as not pressed since the respondent surrendered the vacant possession of the petition schedule building.
Key Reasoning:
The respondent surrendered the property.
Why Defendant Won:
The respondent surrendered the property.
Supporting Evidence
the respondent has surrendered the vacant possession of petition schedule building along with keys.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence rent control petition is dismissed as not pressed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
T.R. Santhi
Party Age
59
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Priya M.R.
Party Age
42
Plaintiffs Documents
Rent Control Petition
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Arunkumar M.R.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Babu Cherukara
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Albert Abey V.S.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The rent control petition is dismissed as not pressed.
Evidence:
the rent control petition is not pressed. Since the respondent has surrendered the vacant possession of petition schedule building along with keys. Hence rent control petition is dismissed as not pressed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between T.R. Santhi vs Priya M.R. regarding Rent Control
Case Code Year
Case between T.R. Santhi vs Priya M.R. regarding Rent Control

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 07/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Wed, 07/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between NAAJCO AUTOMOBILES P LIMITED vs Muhammed Yousef regarding dismissal of rent control petition
THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Rent Control Defendant Won
Case between Mercy John vs K.A.Sandhakumary Suresh regarding rent control
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Plaintiff Won
Case between Thykoodam Edavaka Cristeeya Sangam vs Anta Builders and Developers Private Limited regarding Rent Control
THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Plaintiff Won
Case between Mr. Thomas Jose Pallan vs Ms. Megha M.B. regarding Rent Control
THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Rent Control Plaintiff Won
Case between Bose John vs SNA Oushadhasala Pvt. Ltd et al regarding eviction under the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act 1965.
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Rent Control Plaintiff Won