Case Summary
M/s C S Company filed a petition against Rajendra Prasad and others regarding a rent control matter. The court heard the petition and made a decision on February 13, 2025.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control
Final Judgment
No
The petition filed by M/s C S Company was dismissed by the court.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Petition is dismissed. Pronounced in open court, on this the 13th day of February, 2025.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- M/s C S Company
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Rajendra Prasad
- Party Age
- 62
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Madhubala Gopalan
- Party Age
- 58
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Surabala Murali
- Party Age
- 55
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Jaganatha Prasad
- Party Age
- 60
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Adv.K A Bhadran
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Adv. Manish Kumar K C
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Adv. K Karjet
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Adv. Shaji A M
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The petition filed by the petitioner was dismissed.
Evidence:
Petition is dismissed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Case Code
RCP
Case Code Year
2016