Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No. 53/2024

Case between Sha Salim vs Yahiya regarding realization of money

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Judge
Smt. Ragi.S.
Order Date
2025-10-30
Duration
approximately-2 years 2 months
Case Closed
Thu, 10/30/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Sha Salim, filed a suit against Yahiya for realization of an amount of Rs.50,279/- due to breach of a sale agreement regarding property. The court found that the plaintiff was entitled to the amount claimed as the defendant failed to perform his part of the agreement.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit is decreed in favor of the plaintiff, who is entitled to realize Rs.50,279/- together with interest from the defendant.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Rs.50,279/- together with interest at the rate of 12% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree and at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of decree till realization
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit is decreed in favor of the plaintiff, who is entitled to realize Rs.50,279/- together with interest from the defendant.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The defendant failed to perform his part of the agreement and there was no evidence to suggest repayment.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The defendant failed to perform his part of the agreement and there was no evidence to suggest repayment.
Supporting Evidence
The evidence of PW1, and Exts.A1 to A8 would substantiate the plaint claim. There is no contra evidence to prove otherwise. Thus, it can be concluded that the plaintiff is entitled to realize the plaint claim from the defendant.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: Plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of Rs.50,279/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Two Hundred and Seventy Nine only) together with interest at the rate of 12% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree and at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of decree till realisation, from the defendant and his assets, with costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sha Salim
Party Age
39
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Yahiya
Party Age
65
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Special Power of Attorney, Land tax receipt, Photocopy of sale deed No. 3617/2010, Agreement for sale, Statement of account, Legal notice, Postal receipt
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
A. Abdul Khalam
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Nazrin A Khalam
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Niveditha. P
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Jayasree. K
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to realise the amount of Rs.50,279/- with interest.
Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: Plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of Rs.50,279/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Two Hundred and Seventy Nine only) together with interest at the rate of 12% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Special Power of Attorney
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Authored document for representation in court.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Land Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proof of property tax payment.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document evidencing the sale of the property.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Agreement for sale
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Main agreement establishing sale terms.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Agreement for sale
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Extension of the agreement for sale.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Statement of Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document indicating payments made.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Legal Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Legal notice sent to the defendant regarding the sale agreement.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proof of dispatch of legal notice.
Reference:
Ext.A8

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sha Salim vs Yahiya regarding realization of money
Case Code Year
Case between Sha Salim vs Yahiya regarding realization of money

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Tue, 08/01/2023 - 12:00
Case Closed
Thu, 10/30/2025 - 12:00
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Vijayendran, Chithra vs Yamunadevi regarding review of order
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Navasudeen.S vs Sira Group regarding review of an earlier order
Court of the Munsiff, Kollam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sajeev vs T.Unnikrishna Pillai regarding setting aside an exparte decree.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Gopakumar vs K.S.Abdul Manaf regarding Realisation of Money
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM.
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Bank of India vs Shibina. S et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won