Case Summary
SAYID and others are the petitioners seeking relief under the code of Civil Procedure for a decree enforcement. The respondent, CHIRAYIL M ABDULLA, did not enter an appearance in court.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Procedure
Final Judgment
No
The court closed the execution petition after recording full satisfaction of the decree holder.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Full satisfaction recorded.
Full satisfaction recorded.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Full satisfaction recorded.
Full satisfaction recorded.
Supporting Evidence
Full satisfaction recorded.
Judgment Evidence:
This petition filed under Order XXI Rule 35 of the code of Civil Procedure. Decree Holder represented. Shop room delivered. Full satisfaction recorded. EP closed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- SAYID
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- HAJARA
- Party Age
- 47
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- HAKKIM
- Party Age
- 41
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- JABIR
- Party Age
- 47
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- CHIRAYIL M ABDULLA
- Party Age
- 66
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Abdul Latheef. V. K
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Shop room delivered and full satisfaction recorded.
Evidence:
Shop room delivered. Full satisfaction recorded.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Procedure
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
EP
Case Code Year
2025