Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
EP 197/2025

Case between KUNHALI HAJI vs FATHIMATH SUHARA regarding shop room delivery

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Judge
Sri. Yadukrishnan. B
Order Date
2025-10-28
Duration
Case Code No.
197
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

KUNHALI HAJI is the petitioner who filed the petition to deliver possession of a shop room. FATHIMATH SUHARA is the respondent in this case.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The petition was filed under the Civil Procedure Code for the delivery of shop room possession, and the court ordered full satisfaction of the decree.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Full satisfaction recorded. EP closed.
Case Type
Civil Procedure
Final Judgment
No
The petition was filed under the Civil Procedure Code for the delivery of shop room possession, and the court ordered full satisfaction of the decree.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found the decree holder represented and satisfaction of the decree was recorded.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found the decree holder represented and satisfaction of the decree was recorded.
Supporting Evidence
Full satisfaction recorded.

Judgment Evidence:

EP closed. Full satisfaction recorded.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
KUNHALI HAJI
Party Age
71
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
FATHIMATH SUHARA
Party Age
32
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. P Anoop
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. Amaya
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Abdul Raoof
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Decree Holder represented. Shop room delivered. Full satisfaction recorded.
Evidence:
Decree Holder represented. Shop room delivered. Full satisfaction recorded.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Procedure
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
EP
Case Code Year
2025

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode District, Kerala
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between KUNNUMMAL VAYANGODAN MOIDU vs 1THANDANTAPARAMBATH SULFIKAR ALI et al regarding shop room delivery.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Procedure Plaintiff Won
Case between SAYID et al vs CHIRAYIL M ABDULLA regarding Full satisfaction recorded.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Procedure Plaintiff Won
Case between FATHIMA et al vs RAHILA regarding property delivery satisfaction.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Procedure Plaintiff Won
Case between Neelam Parambhath Chandran et al vs Neelam Parambhath Asokan et al regarding Property Delivery
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Procedure Plaintiff Won
Case between Kizhakkayil Kunhabdulla vs Praveesh Kottollathil regarding civil procedure.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Procedure Plaintiff Won