Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
EP 211/2025

Case between KUNNUMMAL VAYANGODAN MOIDU vs 1THANDANTAPARAMBATH SULFIKAR ALI et al regarding shop room delivery.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Judge
Sri. Yadukrishnan. B
Order Date
2025-10-22
Duration
Case Code No.
211
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Kunnummal Vayangodan Moidu has filed a petition related to the delivery of a shop room. Respondents include multiple parties linked to the property.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ordered the delivery of the shop room as per the satisfaction recorded. The execution petition is closed.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Procedure
Final Judgment
No
The court ordered the delivery of the shop room as per the satisfaction recorded. The execution petition is closed.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petition was filed under the proper legal rule and full satisfaction was recorded.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The petition was filed under the proper legal rule and full satisfaction was recorded.
Supporting Evidence
The petition filed under Order XXI Rule 35 of the code of Civil Procedure was acknowledged, and full satisfaction was recorded by the court.

Judgment Evidence:

Decree Holder represented. Amin filed report. Shop room delivered. Full satisfaction recorded. EP closed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
KUNNUMMAL VAYANGODAN MOIDU
Party Age
66
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
1THANDANTAPARAMBATH SULFIKAR ALI
Party Age
42
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
2THERUVATH SAJIR
Party Age
40
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
3THERUVATH NAVAS
Party Age
45
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
4AACHALIYATH NISAR
Party Age
46
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Petition filed under Order XXI Rule 35 of the code of Civil Procedure.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. P. Balagopalan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. Mini. K. Koyeri
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. P. Arun Kumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Shop room delivered and full satisfaction recorded.
Evidence:
Shop room delivered. Full satisfaction recorded.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Procedure
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
EP
Case Code Year
2025

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode District, Kerala State
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between SAYID et al vs CHIRAYIL M ABDULLA regarding Full satisfaction recorded.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Procedure Plaintiff Won
Case between KUNHALI HAJI vs FATHIMATH SUHARA regarding shop room delivery
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Procedure Plaintiff Won
Case between FATHIMA et al vs RAHILA regarding property delivery satisfaction.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Procedure Plaintiff Won
Case between Neelam Parambhath Chandran et al vs Neelam Parambhath Asokan et al regarding Property Delivery
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Procedure Plaintiff Won
Case between Kizhakkayil Kunhabdulla vs Praveesh Kottollathil regarding civil procedure.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Procedure Plaintiff Won