Case Summary
This case involves Fathima and others as petitioners and Rahila as the respondent. The petition is about the delivery of property and recording full satisfaction of the decree.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Property delivered and full satisfaction recorded.
Case Type
Civil Procedure
Final Judgment
No
The court recorded full satisfaction of the property delivery, resulting in the closure of the execution petition.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The decree holder was absent but the court recognized full satisfaction of the decree.
The decree holder was absent but the court recognized full satisfaction of the decree.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The decree holder was absent but the court recognized full satisfaction of the decree.
The decree holder was absent but the court recognized full satisfaction of the decree.
Supporting Evidence
Decree Holder absent. Property delivered. Full satisfaction recorded.
Judgment Evidence:
Property delivered. Full satisfaction recorded. EP closed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- FATHIMA
- Party Age
- 64
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- RAHINA
- Party Age
- 40
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- RAHIMA
- Party Age
- 34
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- RAHILA
- Party Age
- 44
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. A. K. Balakrishnan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Smt. Shabana. M. K
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Property delivered and full satisfaction recorded.
Evidence:
Property delivered. Full satisfaction recorded.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Procedure
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
EP
Case Code Year
2025