Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
Restoration Petition 594/2017

Case between Sayedali vs Sakkeer Hussain regarding restoration petition

Court
Munsiff Magistrate Court at Tirur, Malappuram
Judge
Smt. Vincy TV
Order Date
2017-08-29
Duration
0 years, 6 months, 1 days
Case Closed
Tue, 08/29/2017 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Petitioner Sayedali filed a restoration petition within 15 days of disposal seeking an opportunity to proceed with the suit, which was granted on payment of costs.

Judgment Outcome

Partial Relief
Interim Order
The restoration petition was allowed on payment of costs, granting the petitioner an opportunity to proceed with the suit.
Judgment Favored
Petitioner
Relief Granted
Opportunity to proceed with the suit
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Final Judgment
No
The restoration petition was allowed on payment of costs, granting the petitioner an opportunity to proceed with the suit.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Heard. Since the petition is filed within 15 days of disposal .Hence it is necessary to give them one more opportunity to proceed with the suit. But the difficulty and inconvenience caused to the defendant can be cured only terms. Hence this IA stands allowed on payment of costs of 1500 each R2 and R3. For payment. Cost paid. Hence IA closed. Date : 29-08-2017 Munsiff Magistrate Tirur,Malappuram

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sayedali
Party Age
57
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sakkeer Hussain
Party Age
41
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
T.B.Abdul Jabbar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Advocate appearing for Sakkeer Hussain
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Opportunity to proceed with the suit
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Seeking an opportunity to proceed with the suit
Evidence:
The restoration petition was allowed on payment of costs, granting the petitioner an opportunity to proceed with the suit.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Restoration Petition
Category
Case Restoration and Delays
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sayedali vs Sakkeer Hussain regarding restoration petition
Case Code Year
Case between Sayedali vs Sakkeer Hussain regarding restoration petition

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur, Malappuram
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Case Closed
Tue, 08/29/2017 - 12:00
From
Tue, 08/01/2017 - 12:00
To
Thu, 08/31/2017 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Kolangara Kumaran et al vs Haridasan et al regarding restoration petition
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Restoration Petition Unknown
Case between Achuthan vs Kali et al regarding restoration petition
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Restoration Petition Defendant Won
Case between Kunheevi vs Puthiyakath Kinattingal Ramlath et al regarding restoration petition
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Restoration Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Kalarikkal Muhammedkutty vs Kalarikkal Kunhimon regarding restoration petition
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Restoration Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between T.Vijayakumar Takur Sing Sett vs Thekkumpurath Sulaikha regarding restoration
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Restoration Petition Plaintiff Won