Case Summary
The case involves a review petition filed by Satheesh Kumar against Gokul Gopinath and others regarding an earlier court order. The petition was dismissed due to the petitioner not being represented in court.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The petition was dismissed for default due to the absence of the petitioner. No steps were taken on behalf of the respondents.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Petitioner not represented and called absent. No steps seen taken for the respondent. Hence petition dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Satheesh Kumar
- Party Age
- 57
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Gokul Gopinath
- Party Age
- 31
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Gopinathan Nair
- Party Age
- 72
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sonu Gopinath
- Party Age
- 29
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- G.Gopakumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Satheesh Kumar vs Gokul Gopinath et al regarding review of order
Case Code Year
Case between Satheesh Kumar vs Gokul Gopinath et al regarding review of order