Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS No. 226/2025

Case between Sasidharan N et al vs Santhakumar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Court
The Additional Munsiff Court
Judge
Smt. Sofia.T.A
Order Date
2025-07-11
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioners/plaintiffs filed a petition for maintaining status quo regarding a J schedule pathway while the original suit is pending. The respondents/defendants contested the suit, stating it was not maintainable and that the J schedule property is a public way.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The petition filed for maintaining status quo on the J schedule pathway has been dismissed with costs in favor of the respondents.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The petition filed for maintaining status quo on the J schedule pathway has been dismissed with costs in favor of the respondents.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Reason not clearly mentioned

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the petition is dismissed with costs in favour of the respondents.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sasidharan N
Party Age
75
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sheela Sudheesh
Party Age
58
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Adv Jyolsana J.G
Party Age
51
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Syam P.S
Party Age
53
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Jana Prakash
Party Age
60
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Santhakumar
Party Age
65
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Joji S.
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Adv. Shine. S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Adv.Adarsh. S.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
The petitioners requested an order to maintain status quo and restrain the defendants from making alterations or new constructions.
Evidence:
In the result, the petition is dismissed with costs in favour of the respondents.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The court based its decision on the details provided in the commission report regarding the J schedule pathway.
Reference:

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sasidharan N et al vs Santhakumar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Sasidharan N et al vs Santhakumar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Vijayendran, Chithra vs Yamunadevi regarding review of order
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Navasudeen.S vs Sira Group regarding review of an earlier order
Court of the Munsiff, Kollam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sajeev vs T.Unnikrishna Pillai regarding setting aside an exparte decree.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Gopakumar vs K.S.Abdul Manaf regarding Realisation of Money
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM.
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Bank of India vs Shibina. S et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won