ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 137 OF 2011

Case between Sasidharan et al vs Illathayil et al regarding injunction

Court

Court of the Munsiff of Tirur

Judge

Smt. Vincy.T.V.

Order Date

2017-12-07

Duration

6 years

Case Closed

Thu, 12/07/2017 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Two plaintiffs filed a suit for injunction against defendants, but the suit got dismissed as the plaintiff was absent during the hearing.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Not Granted

Case Type

Civil Suit - Injunction

Final Judgment

The suit for injunction was dismissed with costs as the plaintiff was absent during the hearing.

Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Suit for injunction. Defendant present. The counsel for plaintiff reported that he has no instruction from his client. Name of the plaintiff is called. Absent. Hence suit is dismissed with costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Sasidharan
Party Age: 57
Relation: S/o. Mattayi Parambil Madhavan

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Sajith
Party Age: 25
Relation: S/o. Mattayi Parambil Sasidharan

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Illathayil @ Melakath Puthiya Maliyekkal Abdul Latheef
Party Age: 40
Relation: S/o. Illathayil Pallikkutty Umma

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Nafeesa
Party Age: 36
Relation: W/o. Illathayil @ Melakath Puthiya Maliyekkal Abdul Salam

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: M.P. Abdul Salam

Plaintiffs Documents

Not available

Defendants Documents

Not available

Advocates

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction

Outcome: Not Granted

Description:

Plaintiff's request for injunction dismissed due to plaintiff's absence

Evidence: