Case Summary
The complainant Sarojini Amma alleges that the accused Suma Mary Jacob borrowed Rs.1,50,000/- and issued a cheque that was dishonoured. The court dismissed the complaint due to the complainant's absence in court.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Criminal Case
Final Judgment
No
The complaint has been dismissed, and the accused is acquitted due to the complainant's repeated absence from the proceedings.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
In the result: The complaint is dismissed under section 256 (1) of Cr.P.C. and resultantly the accused is acquitted.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sarojini Amma
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Suma Mary Jacob
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Complainant
- Advocate Name
- G. Vijayakumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. K.P. Sajinath
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Complaint dismissed under section 256(1) of Cr.P.C. and the accused is acquitted.
Evidence:
The complaint is dismissed under section 256 (1) of Cr.P.C. and resultantly the accused is acquitted.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Criminal Case
Category
Cheque Bounce Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Cheque dishonour
Case Code
ST.NO.
Case Code Year
2023
Case Flags
Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 N.I. Act