Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
R.C.P. No. 71/2022

Case between Santo Davis vs Hotel Ashoka Bhavan et al regarding rent control proceedings.

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
Smt. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2025-09-17
Duration
approximately-1 year 1 month 17 days

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Mr. Santo Davis filed a petition regarding non-compliance of a rent control order by the respondents, which include Hotel Ashoka Bhavan and its managing partner. The court found that the respondents failed to comply with a prior order pertaining to rent arrears.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court found the respondents in default for not complying with a rent control order. Consequently, the proceedings were stopped and the petitioner was granted possession of the property.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Petitioner directed to be put in vacant possession of the building within 30 days.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The respondents failed to comply with the prior order and did not show sufficient cause for their non-compliance.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence an order is passed under section 12(3) of the Act stopping all the further proceedings in the rent control petition and directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building within 30 days from today.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Mr. Santo Davis (41 years) Mareena House, Ernakulam North PO, Kaloor, Ernakulam, PIN-682018

Defendants

M/s. Hotel Ashoka Bhavan (null years) Banerji Road, Kacherippady, Ernakulam, Kochi-18 Mr. Seetharaman (72 years) Ram Nivas, K.K. Padmanabhan Road, Kochi-18 Mr. Madhu Seetharaman (41 years) Hotel Ashoka Bhavan, Banerji Road, Kacherippady, Ernakulam, Kochi-18

Reliefs

Relief Type: Possession
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Order directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building within 30 days.
Evidence:
Hence an order is passed under section 12(3) of the Act stopping all the further proceedings in the rent control petition and directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building within 30 days from today.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Sat, 09/17/2022 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases