Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ST.No. 28/2021

Case between Sajeev R vs Bhagyaraj regarding offence punishable under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.

Court
Judicial Magistrate of First Class – V, Kollam
Judge
Smt. Sofia T.A.
Order Date
2025-12-22
Duration
approximately-5 years 6 months
Case Code No.
28
Case Closed
Mon, 12/22/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Sajeev R filed a complaint against Bhagyaraj alleging that a cheque issued by the accused was dishonoured due to insufficient funds. The court found that the complainant failed to appear for evidence despite several opportunities, leading to the dismissal of the complaint.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The complaint was dismissed, and the accused was acquitted due to the complainant's failure to present evidence.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Criminal Case
Final Judgment
No
The complaint was dismissed, and the accused was acquitted due to the complainant's failure to present evidence.
Key Reasoning:
The court exercised its discretion under section 256 Cr.P.C. due to the complainant's absence and lack of interest in prosecuting the case.
Why Defendant Won:
The court exercised its discretion under section 256 Cr.P.C. due to the complainant's absence and lack of interest in prosecuting the case.
Supporting Evidence
The court found that the complainant failed to adduce evidence despite several opportunities given, leading to the presumption of lack of interest.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result: The complaint is dismissed under section 256 (1) of Cr.P.C. and resultantly the accused is acquitted.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sajeev R
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Devika
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Bhagyaraj
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Complainant
Advocate Name
Sri.G.Sethu Nathan Pillai
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Complaint dismissed under section 256(1) of Cr.P.C.
Evidence:
The complaint is dismissed under section 256 (1) of Cr.P.C. and resultantly the accused is acquitted.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Criminal Case
Category
Cheque Bounce Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Cheque dishonour
Case Code
ST.NO.
Case Code Year
2021

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 N.I. Act

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Wed, 01/27/2021 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 12/22/2025 - 12:00
From
Sat, 11/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Jamaludeen K.P. vs A. Mani regarding dishonour of cheque
Court of Judicial Magistrate of the First Class-V, Kollam
Criminal Case Plaintiff Won
Case between Shanavas vs Sunil Lal regarding Offence punishable under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
COURT OF THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS – V
Criminal Case Defendant Won
Case between Kishore vs Lathika Kumari regarding offence punishable under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
COURT OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF THE FIRST CLASS-V
Criminal Case Plaintiff Won
Case between T.S. Pradeep vs Suni Lal regarding Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
COURT OF THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS – V
Criminal Case Defendant Won
Case between R. Sreekumar vs Smt. Kavitha Venkideswaran regarding Offence punishable under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
Court of the Judicial Magistrate of First Class – V, Kollam
Criminal Case Defendant Won