Case Summary
The case involves the plaintiffs Sajeev and others filing against the defendants Jalaludheen and Jasin seeking a preliminary decree. The plaintiffs were absent during the hearing, leading to the dismissal of the suit.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiffs' absence and lack of representation.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sajeev
- Party Age
- 48
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Subaida Beevi
- Party Age
- 75
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Saboora
- Party Age
- 55
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Jesna
- Party Age
- 28
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Jalaludheen
- Party Age
- 16
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Jasin
- Party Age
- 28
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Muhammed Humayoon.M
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
Suit dismissed for default due to plaintiff's absence.
Evidence:
Plaintiff absent, no representation. Defect not cured. No representation on his part. Suit dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sajeev et al vs Jalaludheen et al regarding passing a preliminary decree
Case Code Year
Case between Sajeev et al vs Jalaludheen et al regarding passing a preliminary decree