Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 309 OF 2017

Case between Saifu.P.P. et al vs Aathikka.K. et al regarding Injunction

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Judge
Smt.NIMMI.K.K.
Order Date
2019-03-02
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves multiple plaintiffs and defendants where the plaintiffs sought an injunction. However, both the plaintiffs and defendants were absent during the hearing, leading to the dismissal of the suit.

Judgment Outcome

Partial Relief
Interim Order
The suit for injunction has been dismissed due to the absence of both parties in court. No costs were awarded in this case.
Judgment Favored
Dismissed
Relief Granted
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The suit for injunction has been dismissed due to the absence of both parties in court. No costs were awarded in this case.
Key Reasoning:
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Suit dismissed for default without costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Saifu.P.P.
Party Age
29
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sabeeb.P.P.
Party Age
25
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Asifa.P.P.
Party Age
21
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Fahad.P.P.
Party Age
20
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Fathima
Party Age
50
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Aathikka.K.
Party Age
45
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Hassan
Party Age
28
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Hussain
Party Age
28
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.P.Najmudheen
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.C.P.Jamshid Rahman
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.Suresh.A.Alingal
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
Suit for Injunction.
Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default without costs.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Saifu.P.P. et al vs Aathikka.K. et al regarding Injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Saifu.P.P. et al vs Aathikka.K. et al regarding Injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur Taluk
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Fri, 03/01/2019 - 12:00
To
Sun, 03/31/2019 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Kottekkunnu Sree Durga Devi Kshethra Committee et al vs Gopalakrishnan et al regarding injunction.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Arakkal Veettil Moosa vs Kuroor Hamza et al regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Janardhanan et al vs Kerala State Electricity Board et al regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Muhammed Haji vs The Deputy Tahsildar (Revenue Recovery) et al regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Injunction Dismissed
Case between Kamarudheen vs T.H. Abdurahiman regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Injunction Defendant Won