Case Summary
Petitioner Saidu Mohaidheen filed a restoration petition against Kuniyil Ismail and others, but the petition was dismissed as the petitioner was absent during the court hearing.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Not Decided
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Final Judgment
No
The petition was dismissed as the petitioner, Saidu Mohaidheen @ Moideenkutty, was absent during the court hearing.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Not mentioned
Judgment Evidence:
Name of petitioner called. Absent. Hence petition is dismissed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Kuniyil Ismail
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Poochengal Pathummakutty
- Party Age
- 62
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sulaiman
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Abdulla
- Party Age
- 49
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sainaba
- Party Age
- 43
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Rukhiya
- Party Age
- 36
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Mymoona
- Party Age
- 41
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned
Advocates
- Party Role
- Petitioner
- Advocate Name
- K.Vipin
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Respondent
- Advocate Name
- M.K.Moosakutty
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Not Decided
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Unknown
Evidence:
Name of petitioner called. Absent. Hence petition is dismissed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Category
Case Restoration and Delays
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Saidu Mohaidheen @ Moideenkutty vs Kuniyil Ismail et al regarding restoration petition
Case Code Year
Case between Saidu Mohaidheen @ Moideenkutty vs Kuniyil Ismail et al regarding restoration petition