Case Summary
Saidalavi is the plaintiff and Nishab is the defendant in a suit for injunction and arrears of rent. The suit was decreed as per the terms of the compromise petition.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The suit was decreed based on the lawful terms of the compromise petition. It is recorded as part of the decree.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Terms of the compromise petition are lawful.
Terms of the compromise petition are lawful.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Terms of the compromise petition are lawful.
Terms of the compromise petition are lawful.
Supporting Evidence
Terms of the compromise petition are lawful.
Judgment Evidence:
Suit decreed as per terms of compromise petition and it shall form part of decree.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Saidalavi
- Party Age
- 58
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Nishab
- Party Age
- 36
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. V.Chandrasekharan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Vipin Chandrasekhar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.P.Praveen.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Suit for Injunction and for arrears of rent.
Evidence:
Suit decreed as per terms of compromise petition and it shall form part of decree.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Saidalavi vs Nishab regarding Injunction and for arrears of rent.
Case Code Year
Case between Saidalavi vs Nishab regarding Injunction and for arrears of rent.