Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 697/2025

Case between Sahala Jalal vs Jinson M.D regarding realisation of money

Court
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-12-12
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Sahala Jalal filed a suit against Jinson M.D for the recovery of ₹5,00,000/- based on a breached agreement. The defendant failed to appear in court, leading to a default judgment.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court found in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to repay ₹5,00,000/- along with interest. The defendant was absent during the proceedings.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendant is directed to pay ₹5,00,000/- with interest at 6% per annum.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The uncontested evidence of the plaintiff proved the case against the defendant.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: I. The defendant is directed to pay to the plaintiff, an amount of ₹5,00,000/- (Rupees five lakhs only) with interest at the rate of 6% per annum (simple interest) from the date of institution of the suit, till its realisation from the defendant or from assets of defendant.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Sahala Jalal (26 years) Anjikkath house, Kanayannur Taluk, Thrikkakara North Village, Cusat P.O., Pin - 682 022

Defendants

Jinson M.D (42 years) Marotikkal House, Temple Road, Kanayannur Taluk, Vazhakala Village, Thrikkakara P.O, Pin - 682 021

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover an amount of ₹5,00,000/- along with interest from the defendant.
Evidence:
I am of the opinion that the defendant owe a total amount of ₹5,00,000/- to the plaintiff.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to the costs of the suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
the plaintiff is entitled to the costs of the suit from the defendant.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was part of the evidence to establish the agreement between the plaintiff and defendant regarding the loan amount.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Office copy of the lawyer notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was used to demonstrate the notice issued to the defendant regarding the repayment.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was indicative of the postage sent to the defendant for the notice concerning repayment.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Postal Acknowledgment Card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document supported the claim that the defendant received the notice regarding the payment.
Reference:
Ext.A4

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases