Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 695/2022

Case between Naseema vs Sajana regarding realization of money

Court
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany
Order Date
2025-12-19
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Naseema, claims that the defendant, Sajana, borrowed Rs. 6,50,000 and failed to repay it despite agreements. The defendant denies the loan and the existence of a promissory note.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed that the defendant shall pay Rs. 6,50,000 along with interest at 6% per annum to the plaintiff. The defendant's assets shall be liable to satisfy the decree.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendant shall pay Rs. 6,50,000 with interest
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The execution of the promissory note was proved by the plaintiff's witnesses.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed as follows: Defendant shall pay Rs. 6,50,000/- along with interest @ 6% from the date of suit till the payment or realization.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Naseema (40 years) Manappurath Veettil, Edayapuram Karayil, Keezhumadu Village, Aluva Taluk, Ernakulam District, Pin - 683 101

Defendants

Sajana (40 years) Neerungal House, Njalakam Karayil, Rajagiri P O, Thrikkakara North Village, Ernakulam District, Pin - 683 104

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Recovery of Rs. 6,50,000/- along with interest.
Evidence:
Defendant shall pay Rs.6,50,000/-(Rupees Six lakhs fifty thousand rupees only) along with interest @ 6% from the date of suit till the payment or realization.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Entitlement to recover costs of the suit.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is also entitled to realize the costs of the suit.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed by the defendant as a confirmation of the loan repayment obligation.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Legal Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Demanding repayment of the loan amount along with interest.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proof of sending the legal notice.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Passport
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Used to demonstrate that the signature on the promissory note is not that of the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type: Identity Card
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Also used to establish that the signature on the promissory note differs from the defendant's.
Reference:
Ext.B2

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases