Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 920/2021

Case between Radhakrishnan M U et al vs Santhosh Kumar P P regarding realization of money

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany
Order Date
2025-11-25
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, Radhakrishnan M U and Sreedevi S A, are husband and wife engaged in the business of assembling welding machines. They are seeking recovery of Rs. 2,00,000/- lease amount from the defendant, Santhosh Kumar P P, who unlawfully evicted them from the leased property.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court found that the plaintiffs failed to prove their case and dismissed the suit.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The evidence indicated that the plaintiffs had already received all amounts due to them, including the lease consideration.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is dismissed with costs.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Radhakrishnan M U (53 years) Sreeragam, Manakapparambu Road, Manakunnam Village, Udayamperoor, Nadakkavu, Kanayannur Taluk, Ernakulam District Sreedevi S A (46 years) Sreeragam, Manakapparambu Road, Manakunnam Village, Udayamperoor, Nadakkavu, Kanayannur Taluk, Ernakulam District

Defendants

Santhosh Kumar P P (Age not specified years) Ankith Vihar, Anchumana Desam, Edappally Village, Kanayannur Taluk, Ernakulam District

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Plaintiffs claimed recovery of Rs.2,00,000/- as lease amount.
Evidence:
The court is satisfied that the plaintiff has failed to prove his case and he is not entitled to any relief as claimed for.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Original Token letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Serves as evidence of the token advance of Rs.10,000/- paid by plaintiffs on 06.02.2021.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Encumbrance certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Reveals that the property was under attachment by court order and subject to a mortgage.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Agreement of Lease
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Details the lease agreement entered into by plaintiffs and defendant on 17.02.2021.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Statement of account (Subject to Proof)
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows the cheque of Rs.2,00,000/- paid by plaintiffs to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Original of the Sale agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Evidence of the second sale agreement where an additional Rs.5,00,000/- was paid.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Original of the Settlement agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Indicates a compromise agreement between parties regarding the return of amounts.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Bank authorized statement of account from 09.02.2021 to 07.05.2021 (Subject to Proof)
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Supports the claims made by the plaintiffs regarding payments made.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Statement of account from 01.02.2021 to 31.10.2021
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Examined to support the defendant's claims regarding returned amounts.
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type: Oral Evidence
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Testimonies from plaintiffs and defendant concerning the case.
Reference:

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases