Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 1022/2023

Case between Nadamel Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd. et al vs Sheeba Thambi regarding recovery of money

Court
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-09-12
Duration
approximately-2 years

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Nadamel Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd. filed a case against Sheeba Thambi for recovery of money based on a cheque issued by the defendant towards a legally enforceable debt. The court considered applications to accept additional documents and to recall a witness for further evidence.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed both I.As for lacking proper justification regarding the belated production of documents and the recall of the witness. The plaintiff's applications were deemed insufficient.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The petitions lacked sufficient justification for their requests.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, IA 7/2025 and IA 8/2025 stands dismissed.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Nadamel Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd. (Age not specified years) North Fort Gate, Nadama Desom, Nadama Village, Kanayannoor Taluk, Tripunithura, Ernakulam District, Pin – 682 301

Defendants

Sheeba Thambi (53 years) Kuttazhathu, Nadama Village, Tripunithura, Pin – 682 301

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Petitions I.A 7/2025 and I.A 8/2025 were filed to accept additional documents and recall PW1 for tendering evidence.
Evidence:
Hence, I am of the opinion that IA 7/2025 and 8/2025 cannot be positively entertained and they are to be dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Certified Copies
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copies of Registration Certificate amended, By-law amendment, and Group Deposits Scheme (Remittance) Ledger are produced to support the case of the plaintiff.
Reference:
Document Type: Oral Evidence
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Testimony of the Secretary in charge of the plaintiff bank examined as PW1.
Reference:

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam District
Case Filed
Sun, 01/01/2023 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases