Case Summary
Safiya, the plaintiff, initiated a suit for injunction. The defendant, Abdul Azeez.K.P., was represented, but ultimately the plaintiff was absent and the suit was dismissed for default.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit as the plaintiff was absent and not represented. The matter was reported to have been settled in Adalath.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff was absent, leading to dismissal of the suit for default.
Plaintiff was absent, leading to dismissal of the suit for default.
Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiff was absent, leading to dismissal of the suit for default.
Plaintiff was absent, leading to dismissal of the suit for default.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff called absent. Not represented. Suit dismissed for default.
Judgment Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Safiya
- Party Age
- 49
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Abdul Azeez.K.P.
- Party Age
- 58
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Irshad.K.K.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. C.P.Jamshid Rahman
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Majeed Kolakkad
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Suit dismissed for default.
Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Safiya vs Abdul Azeez.K.P. regarding Injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Safiya vs Abdul Azeez.K.P. regarding Injunction
Case Flags
Adalath Resolved
Out-of-Court Settlement