ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 113 OF 2013

Case between Sabeermon vs Nafeesa et al regarding injunction.

Court

THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR

Judge

Smt.NIMMI.K.K.

Order Date

2019-02-02

Duration

Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Sabeermon is the plaintiff seeking an injunction against Nafeesa and others. The suit was dismissed by the court due to the absence of the plaintiff.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Injunction

Final Judgment

The injunction suit was dismissed as the plaintiff was absent and not represented in court.

Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned.

Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned.

Supporting Evidence

Plaintiff called absent. Defendants present.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit is dismissed with costs to defendants.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Sabeermon
Party Age: 19
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Nafeesa
Party Age: 48
Relation: W/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Kunheethu
Party Age: 55
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: M.V.Abdu Haji
Party Age: 62
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Mammukutty
Party Age: 52
Relation: S/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Sri. Gopi Kadavath
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Sri. M.A.Ismail
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Sri. M.P.Hussain
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Sri.K.P.Shereef
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Sri.M.Abdul Kader
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Smt.Nisha.P.
Appearance Type: Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction

Outcome: Refused

Description:

Suit for injunction dismissed.

Evidence: