OS. No. 79/2018

Case between Sabeena vs Noohukannu et al regarding partition

Court

COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, KOLLAM

Judge

Smt. Sofia.T.A.

Order Date

2025-12-19

Duration

approximately-7 years 0 days

Case Closed

Fri, 12/19/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves a suit filed by the plaintiff Sabeena for partition. The court noted that the plaintiff was absent with no representation and no steps taken for final decree.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won

Interim Order

The preliminary decree was passed in the absence of the plaintiff with no steps taken for the final decree. The suit is closed with an opportunity to revive if steps are taken.

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Civil Suit

Final Judgment

The preliminary decree was passed in the absence of the plaintiff with no steps taken for the final decree. The suit is closed with an opportunity to revive if steps are taken.

Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Why Defendant Won:
Not available

Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

In this suit preliminary decree passed. But no step taken for Final Decree.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Sabeena
Party Age: 43
Relation: W/o Nassar

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Noohukannu
Party Age: 85
Relation: S/o Said Muhammed Kunju

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Iqbal
Party Age: 50
Relation: S/o Noohukunju

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Rasheeda
Party Age: 48
Relation: W/o Sharafudeen

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Saleena
Party Age: 47
Relation: W/o Vahab

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Rajeena
Party Age: 46
Relation: W/o Noushad

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: G. Govinda Pillai
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Sicin G. Mundakkal
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Preethi G. Nair
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: M. Ziad
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other

Outcome: Granted

Description:

Preliminary decree passed for partition.

Evidence:

In this suit preliminary decree passed.

Relief Type: Other

Outcome: Not Decided

Description:

Final decree not taken.