Case Summary
The plaintiff, Mathew.W, is seeking a partition of property from his sisters, the defendants. The case involves a demand for a decree of partition of specific properties that the plaintiff claims entitlement to.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Preliminary decree for partition allowing 4/6 share to the plaintiff
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit for partition, allowing the plaintiff to receive 4/6 share of the property sought. A preliminary decree was passed for dividing the plaint schedule property.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff successfully proved entitlement to the share based on the settlement deed and other evidentiary documents.
The plaintiff successfully proved entitlement to the share based on the settlement deed and other evidentiary documents.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Here there is no contra evidence to prove otherwise. From the plaint averments and Exts.A1 and A2, it is clear that the plaintiff is entitled to get a decree of partition of the plaint schedule property by metes and bounds as prayed for.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the suit decreed. A preliminary decree for partition is passed as follows: 1.Plaint schedule property shall be divided into six equal shares by metes and bounds. 2.The plaintiff is entitled to get 4/6 share over plaint schedule property by metes and bounds and her share shall be separated.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Mathew.W (Mathukutty)
- Party Age
- 67
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sosamma
- Party Age
- 70
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Ani
- Party Age
- 62
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Certified copy of Settlement Deed No. 2266/09, Certified copy of Release Deed
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- K.Abdul Shahan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Possession
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Decree of partition to allot 4/6 share over plaint schedule property to the plaintiff by metes and bounds.
Evidence:
In the result, the suit decreed. A preliminary decree for partition is passed as follows: 1.Plaint schedule property shall be divided into six equal shares by metes and bounds.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Settlement Deed
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of Settlement Deed No. 2266/2009 dated 24/10/2009 shows that the plaintiff and the defendants are the joint owners of plaint schedule properties.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type:
Release deed
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of Release deed shows that the plaintiff has 4/6 share over the plaint schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Partition
Case Code
Case between Mathew.W (Mathukutty) vs Sosamma et al regarding Partition
Case Code Year
Case between Mathew.W (Mathukutty) vs Sosamma et al regarding Partition