Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No. 465/2023

Case between A.K.Nazimudeen vs Shaima Shaharudeen et al regarding Partition

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Judge
Smt. Ragi.S.
Order Date
2025-07-16
Duration
approximately-1 year 10 months
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, A.K.Nazimudeen, is seeking a partition of property that he holds jointly with the defendants, who are the legal heirs of the deceased Shaharudeen. The case arose after the defendants opposed the plaintiff's attempts to partition the property and include the fifth defendant, who is conducting business on the property without consent.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit for partition was decreed in favor of the plaintiff, entitling him to half the share of the property and an amount of Rs. 3,06,000/- from the defendants.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
A decree of partition and payment of Rs. 3,06,000/-
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit for partition was decreed in favor of the plaintiff, entitling him to half the share of the property and an amount of Rs. 3,06,000/- from the defendants.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found that the plaintiff and the deceased were co-owners of the property, and the defendants failed to provide evidence against the claims.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found that the plaintiff and the deceased were co-owners of the property, and the defendants failed to provide evidence against the claims.
Supporting Evidence
From the plaint averments and Exts.A1 to A7, it is clear that the plaintiff is entitled to get a decree of partition of the plaint schedule property by metes and bounds.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit decreed and a preliminary decree for partition is passed in the following terms: 1.Plaint schedule property shall be divided into two equal shares by metes and bounds. 2.The plaintiff is entitled to get 1/2 share over plaint schedule property by metes and bounds and her share shall be separated.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
A.K.Nazimudeen
Party Age
66
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shaima Shaharudeen
Party Age
54
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Isha Shahar
Party Age
28
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ameena Shahar
Party Age
26
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ajas Shahar
Party Age
25
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mumthas.J
Party Age
42
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Sale Deed No. 773/1987, Sale Deed No. 1199/1988, Land Tax Receipt, Death Certificate of Shaharudeen, Legal heirship Certificate, Office copy of Lawyer notice, Postal receipts.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K.G.Baiju
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Poornima.G.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
I.Sowfiuar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
U.Ullas Kumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Partition
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Decree for partition of the plaint schedule property by metes and bounds.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to get a decree for partition of plaint schedule property as claimed.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Realization of an amount of Rs. 3,06,000/- from the defendants.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of Rs.3,06,000/- (Rupees Three Lakh Six Thousand only) from the defendants and their assets.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows that the plaintiff and the deceased Shaharudeen were title holders of the plaint schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Related to the title ownership of the plaint schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Land Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows that they mutated the plaint schedule property in their name and were remitting land tax.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Death Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proves the death of Shaharudeen.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Legal heirship certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Attested copy proving the legal heirs of Shaharudeen.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Office copy of a lawyer notice sent to the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Postal Receipts
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Series of postal receipts related to communication with defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Legal heirship certificate
Submitted By: Unknown
Relevance:
Photocopy related to legal heirship of Shaharudeen.
Reference:
Ext.X1

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Partition
Case Code
Case between A.K.Nazimudeen vs Shaima Shaharudeen et al regarding Partition
Case Code Year
Case between A.K.Nazimudeen vs Shaima Shaharudeen et al regarding Partition

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Elizabeth Elias vs Metlda Vincent et al regarding Partition
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Rajan vs Sasidharan et al regarding partition.
THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Pradeep B. vs Peethambari et al regarding declaration and partition
THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Mathew.W (Mathukutty) vs Sosamma et al regarding Partition
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Babu Chandhar et al vs Sarada Chandhatty et al regarding Partition.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won