Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 388 OF 2014

Case between Ruksana vs Hamza et al regarding fraud and misrepresentation

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
Smt. VINCY.T.V.
Order Date
2017-12-19
Duration
3 years
Case Closed
Tue, 12/19/2017 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Ruksana filed a suit for injunction against Hamza and others, alleging fraud and misrepresentation in property transaction agreements.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed Ruksana's suit for injunction due to failure to prove fraud and misrepresentation.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Not Decided
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed Ruksana's suit for injunction due to failure to prove fraud and misrepresentation.
Key Reasoning:
Insufficient proof of fraud and misrepresentation.
Why Defendant Won:
Insufficient proof of fraud and misrepresentation.
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Ruksana
Party Age
29
Relation
Daughter of Abdul Khadar
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Hamza
Party Age
43
Relation
Son of Muhammed
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Abdul Majeed
Party Age
43
Relation
Son of Muhammed Kutty
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shahul Hameed
Party Age
34
Relation
Son of Hamza
Plaintiffs Documents
Exhibited documents including Birth Certificate, FIRs, etc.
Defendants Documents
Exhibited documents including Karar, Final Report, Tax Receipts, Possession Certificate.

Advocates

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
Cancellation of sale deeds and recovery of possession
Evidence:

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Kanam Theeradharam
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
True copy exhibited as evidence
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Theeradharam
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
True copy exhibited as evidence
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Exhibited as evidence
Reference:
B7
Document Type: Possession Certificate
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Exhibited as evidence
Reference:
B8(c)

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Category
Injunction and Access Rights
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Fraud
Case Code
Case between Ruksana vs Hamza et al regarding fraud and misrepresentation
Case Code Year
Case between Ruksana vs Hamza et al regarding fraud and misrepresentation

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Wed, 01/01/2014 - 12:00
Case Closed
Tue, 12/19/2017 - 12:00
From
Fri, 12/01/2017 - 12:00
To
Sun, 12/31/2017 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Vazhakkat Muhammed's son llaneefa et al vs Vazhakat Muhammed's son Mijeed regarding injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Puliyoli Deepak vs Thottariyakath Faizal regarding injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Injunction Dismissed
Case between Kainikkara Muhammad Abdu Rahiman et al vs Abdu regarding injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Injunction Dismissed
Case between Hilar et al vs Moidukkante Purakkal Muhammad Kasim regarding injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Injunction Partial
Case between Ambalakkandi Assainar Haji et al vs Chavadikkunnan Hussain et al regarding injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Injunction Defendant Won