Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
R.C.P. No. 07/2025

Case between Roby K. Skariah vs Merin Paul regarding compliance of rent control order

Court
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. REEJA R. NAIR
Order Date
2025-09-15
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Roby K. Skariah, representing his mother, filed a rent control petition against Merin Paul for non-compliance with a previous rent order. The court determined that the respondent failed to comply with the order and directed the respondent to vacate the premises.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court granted an order against the respondent for failing to comply with previous directives regarding rent arrears. The respondent is directed to vacate the premises within 30 days.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Respondent directed to vacate the premises within 30 days.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The respondent failed to comply with the rent control order.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence an order is passed under Section 12(3) of the Act stopping all the further proceedings in the rent control petition and directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building within 30 days from today.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Roby K. Skariah (31 years) Orikkal Karimanal House, Kuravilangad Kara, Kuravilangad Village, Kottayam District-686633 Thresiamma Scariah (Age not specified years) Orikkal Karimanal House, Kuravilangad Kara, Kuravilangad Village, Kottayam District-686633

Defendants

Merin Paul (35 years) Nadupparambil House, HMT Colony P.O., now residing at Nadupparambil House, Hidayath Nagar Road, HMT Colony, Thrikkakara Village, Ernakulam-683503

Reliefs

Relief Type: Possession
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building within 30 days.
Evidence:
Hence an order is passed under Section 12(3) of the Act stopping all the further proceedings in the rent control petition and directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building within 30 days from today.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases