Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
R.C.P. No. 58/2022

Case between Reeja Ravi vs FAIZ Retail Private Limited et al regarding rent arrears and eviction.

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
Smt. REEJA R. NAIR
Order Date
2025-08-27
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Reeja Ravi, the petitioner, is seeking eviction of FAIZ Retail Private Limited and its CEO Shiraz K.V. for non-payment of rent for three consecutive months. The respondents claim they have been paying the rent and dispute the eviction request.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The rent control petition was dismissed as the respondents were found to have cleared the rent arrears, hence the petitioner's request for eviction was denied.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The respondents were found to have paid all outstanding rent, thus meeting their obligations under the lease agreement.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the rent control petition is dismissed. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, parties are liable to suffer their respective costs.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Reeja Ravi (56 years) Door No. 61/1712 B, 4R, Square, Perumanoor P.O, Ernakulum, Pin-682015

Defendants

FAIZ Retail Private Limited (Age not specified years) Opposite NSS Karayogam, K.P Vallen Road, Kadavanthara, Ernakulam-682020 Shiraz K.V (48 years) 3B North Block, Heera Waters Bund Road, Chilavannur-Kochi-682020

Reliefs

Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
The petitioner sought eviction based on non-payment of rent.
Evidence:
The court found that the respondents had cleared all rent arrears by 01.08.2025.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Notarized copy of Power of Attorney
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document establishes the power of the petitioner to act regarding the lease of the property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Original Lease Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The lease agreement between the petitioner and the respondent, outlining the terms and conditions related to rental payments.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Office copy of lawyer notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
A notice issued to the respondents demanding payment of arrears.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Original acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proof of receipt related to the notice sent for demanding rent arrears.
Reference:
Ext.A4 series
Document Type: Certified Copy of Judgment
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document referenced in the court proceedings for previous decisions relevant to this case.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Independent auditor’s certificate on non-receipt of rental income
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Evidence supporting the claim of non-receipt of rent from the respondents.
Reference:
Ext.A6 series
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Evidence of tax payment related to the property in question.
Reference:
Ext.A10
Document Type: Independent auditor’s certificate on non-receipt of rental income
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Further evidence of the non-receipt of rent from the respondents.
Reference:
Ext.A11
Document Type: Power of Attorney
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This document establishes the authority of the defendant's representative in court.
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type: Statement of Axis Bank Account
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Bank statement supporting the defendant's claims regarding rent payments.
Reference:
Ext.B2

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Fri, 04/08/2022 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
70%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases