Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 207 OF 2014

Case between Rasheed @ Kunhippa et al vs Ashraf.O. et al regarding injunction

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
Smt. VINCY.T.V.
Order Date
2017-11-17
Duration
3 years 11 months 26 days
Case Closed
Fri, 11/17/2017 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs filed a suit seeking injunction, but the suit was dismissed by the court as the plaintiff's counsel reported having no instructions from the client.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit filed by the plaintiffs seeking injunction was dismissed by the court with costs.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Dismissal of the suit with costs
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The suit filed by the plaintiffs seeking injunction was dismissed by the court with costs.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff's counsel reported having no instructions from the client.
Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiff's counsel reported having no instructions from the client.
Supporting Evidence
Not available

Judgment Evidence:

Suit for injunction. The counsel for the plaintiff reported that he has no instruction from his client. Name of the plaintiff is called absent. Hence suit is dismissed with costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Rasheed @ Kunhippa
Party Age
40
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Nisha
Party Age
33
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Komukandathil Kadar @ Kunhutty Bava
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ashraf.O.
Party Age
38
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Umaiba
Party Age
30
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Naseer
Party Age
35
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Naseera
Party Age
28
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.V.Chandrasekharan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Vipin Chandrasekharan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.E.M.Purushothaman
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Unknown
Description:
Injunction sought by plaintiffs
Evidence:
Not mentioned

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Category
Injunction and Access Rights
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Rasheed @ Kunhippa et al vs Ashraf.O. et al regarding injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Rasheed @ Kunhippa et al vs Ashraf.O. et al regarding injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Mon, 11/17/2014 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 11/17/2017 - 12:00
From
Wed, 11/01/2017 - 12:00
To
Thu, 11/30/2017 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Vazhakkat Muhammed's son llaneefa et al vs Vazhakat Muhammed's son Mijeed regarding injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Puliyoli Deepak vs Thottariyakath Faizal regarding injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Injunction Dismissed
Case between Thalhath.K et al vs Programme Committee et al regarding injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Kainikkara Muhammad Abdu Rahiman et al vs Abdu regarding injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Injunction Dismissed
Case between Hilar et al vs Moidukkante Purakkal Muhammad Kasim regarding injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Injunction Partial