Case Summary
This case involves a dispute between Ranjith Varghese and Greeni Aruja concerning compliance with a rent control order. The petitioner claims that the respondent has failed to comply with the court's direction regarding rent payment.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The court directed the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court found that the respondent failed to comply with the prior order regarding rent payment and directed the respondent to vacate the premises.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The respondent did not comply with the prior court order to pay rent arrears.
The respondent did not comply with the prior court order to pay rent arrears.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The respondent did not comply with the prior court order to pay rent arrears.
The respondent did not comply with the prior court order to pay rent arrears.
Supporting Evidence
The respondent having failed to comply with the order in IA 4/2024 and having failed to show sufficient cause for not depositing rent arrears in liable to suffer consequence under section 12(3) of the Act.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence an order is passed under section 12(3) of the act stopping all the further proceedings in the rent control petition and directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Ranjith Varghese
- Party Age
- 37
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Greeni Aruja
- Party Age
- 48
- Relation
- D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Affidavit of non-compliance
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- M.P. Ramnath
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Shalu Varghese
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sandhya S.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Bepin Paul
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- P. Rajesh Kottakkal
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Varghese Varghese M
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Antony Tharian
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Pooja Krishna K.B.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Shanthi John
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Nishin George Vijayababu
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Annamma Philip
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Possession
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The respondent is directed to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.
Evidence:
Hence an order is passed under section 12(3) of the act stopping all the further proceedings in the rent control petition and directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Ranjith Varghese vs Greeni Aruja regarding rent control compliance
Case Code Year
Case between Ranjith Varghese vs Greeni Aruja regarding rent control compliance