Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No. 757/2020

Case between Rani et al vs Wilson et al regarding Realisation of Money.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Judge
Smt. Ragi.S.
Order Date
2025-11-25
Duration
Case Code No.
757
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves the plaintiffs Rani, Ruby, and Biji filing a suit for the realization of money against the defendants Wilson and Mercy. The court has rejected the plaint due to the absence of the plaintiffs and non-remittance of court fees.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court has rejected the plaint because the plaintiff was absent and the balance court fee was not remitted.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court has rejected the plaint because the plaintiff was absent and the balance court fee was not remitted.
Key Reasoning:
The plaint was rejected as the plaintiffs were absent and failed to remit the court fee.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The court stated that the plaintiffs were absent and no representation was made.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence plaint rejected u/o 7 Rule 11(c) of Civil Procedure Code.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Rani
Party Age
52
Relation
W/o Vincent
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Ruby
Party Age
49
Relation
W/o Peter
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Biji
Party Age
46
Relation
D/o Joseph
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Wilson
Party Age
53
Relation
S/o Gabriel
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mercy
Party Age
49
Relation
W/o Wilson
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
T.S.Anuraj
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Kottiyam G.Raveendran
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Plaint was rejected due to balance court fee not remitted.
Evidence:
Hence plaint rejected u/o 7 Rule 11(c) of Civil Procedure Code.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Realisation of Money
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2020

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 11/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between M/s. Canara Bank vs Joshna. J et al regarding Realisation of Money.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Lalitha Vikraman @ Lalitha vs Dr.R.Divakaran Chakravarthy regarding Realisation of Money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between The Federal Bank Ltd vs Aswathy.V.S. et al regarding Realisation of Money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between John Bosco vs Sajayakumar et al regarding Realisation of Money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between K.Vijayan vs State of Kerala et al regarding Realisation of Money
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won