Case Summary
The plaintiff, M/s. Canara Bank, filed a suit for the realisation of money. The case involves two defendants, Joshna. J and Johnson Pankras.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The plaintiff was absent and represented by counsel, but did not remit the balance court fee. The court rejected the plaint.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff was absent and did not fulfill procedural requirements.
The plaintiff was absent and did not fulfill procedural requirements.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff was absent and did not fulfill procedural requirements.
The plaintiff was absent and did not fulfill procedural requirements.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff was absent and represented. Balance Court Fee not remitted so far.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence plaint rejected u/o 7 Rule 11(c) of Civil Procedure Code.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- M/s. Canara Bank
- Relation
- represented by its Manager Said
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Joshna. J
- Party Age
- 26
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Johnson Pankras
- Party Age
- 56
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- U.Ullaskumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- I.Sowfiuar
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- A.A.Savad
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
The suit was rejected due to the plaintiff's absence and non-remittance of balance court fee.
Evidence:
Plaintiff absent and represented. Balance Court Fee not remitted so far. Hence plaint rejected u/o 7 Rule 11(c) of Civil Procedure Code.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Realisation of Money
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2023