Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No. 146/2018

Case between K.Vijayan vs State of Kerala et al regarding Realisation of Money

Court
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Judge
Smt. Ragi.S.
Order Date
2025-08-27
Duration
Case Code No.
146
Case Closed
Wed, 08/27/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, K.Vijayan, filed a suit against the State of Kerala and multiple defendants for the realization of money. The court found that the plaintiff had not remitted the balance court fee.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court rejected the plaintiff's case due to non-remittance of the balance court fee.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court rejected the plaintiff's case due to non-remittance of the balance court fee.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff failed to fulfill the mandatory requirement of remitting the balance court fee.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff failed to fulfill the mandatory requirement of remitting the balance court fee.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff not remitted Balance Court Fee so far.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, plaint rejected U/o 7 Rule 11 (c) of Civil Procedure Code.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
K.Vijayan
Party Age
59
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
State of Kerala
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Excise Department of Kerala
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
G.K.Anil Kumar
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sugunan
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Chandrasekhara Pillai
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
R.Bahuleyan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Ajitha T.R.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.R.Sethunathan Pillai
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. D.Baiju Kumar
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Silpa.V.S
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Plaint rejected due to non-remittance of Balance Court Fee.
Evidence:
Hence plaint rejected U/o 7 Rule 11 (c) of Civil Procedure Code.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Realisation of Money
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2018

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Mon, 01/01/2018 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 08/27/2025 - 12:00
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Government

Similar Cases

Case between Maria Dana Dhanavathy vs State of Kerala et al regarding Injunction
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between L.Raju et al vs State of Kerala et al regarding Declaration and injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Shyamala vs Kerala State et al regarding review of order
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Ushakumari vs State of Kerala et al regarding restoration of suit
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Mangalanandan et al vs The Government of Kerala et al regarding Mandatory injunction
IN THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won