Case Summary
The case involves a suit filed by the plaintiff for the realization of money. However, the plaintiff was absent during the hearing.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed as abated due to the absence of the plaintiff and lack of representation.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff absent and no representation.
Plaintiff absent and no representation.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff absent and no representation.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence suit dismissed as abated.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Lalitha Vikraman @ Lalitha
- Party Age
- 75
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Dr.R.Divakaran Chakravarthy
- Party Age
- 65
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Mangalath K. Harikumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- T.R Vinod
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Suit dismissed as abated due to plaintiff's absence.
Evidence:
Hence suit dismissed as abated.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Realisation of Money
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2019