Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No. 92/2024

Case between Rajeev vs Biju regarding specific performance

Court
Munsiff Court, Kollam
Judge
Smt. Sofia.T.A.
Order Date
2025-10-31
Duration
approximately-2 years 3 months
Case Closed
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff Rajeev filed a suit for specific performance against the defendant Biju for executing a sale deed on a property that was agreed to be sold. The defendant failed to comply with the terms of the agreement despite the plaintiff being willing to perform his part.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit was decreed in favor of the plaintiff, entitling him to recover an amount of Rs.6,00,000/- along with interest and costs from the defendant.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of Rs.6,00,000/- with interest and costs.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was decreed in favor of the plaintiff, entitling him to recover an amount of Rs.6,00,000/- along with interest and costs from the defendant.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff succeeded in proving his case with sufficient evidence and there was no evidence to rebut his claims.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff succeeded in proving his case with sufficient evidence and there was no evidence to rebut his claims.
Supporting Evidence
By producing Exts.A1 to A6 and by deposing in tune with the plaint averments in the affidavit, the plaintiff has succeeded in proving his case. Moreover, there is no evidence to rebut the evidence adduced on the side of the plaintiff.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, this suit is decreed as follows: (I) The suit is decreed and the plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of Rs.6,00,000/- (Rupees Six Lakhs Only) together with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of suit till the realization from the defendant and his assets, with costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Rajeev
Party Age
38
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Biju
Party Age
43
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Agreement for sale deed dated 20/07/2023, Copy of settlement deed No.1256/2023, Copy of land tax receipt dated 23/06/2023, Office copy of Lawyer’s notice dated 24/01/2024, Postal receipt dated 24/01/2024, Acknowledgment card.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Vinayachandran.V
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Krishna S.Raj
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Specific Performance
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.6,00,000/- together with interest from the defendant.
Evidence:
In the result, this suit is decreed as follows: (I) The suit is decreed and the plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of Rs.6,00,000/- (Rupees Six Lakhs Only) together with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of suit till the realization from the defendant and his assets, with costs.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendant shall pay costs of the suit to the plaintiff.
Evidence:
(ii) Defendant shall pay costs of the suit to the plaintiff.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Agreement for sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was the basis for the plaintiff's claim for specific performance regarding the sale of the property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Settlement Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document establishes the defendant's ownership of the property which was the subject of the sale agreement.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Land Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document supports the plaintiff's claim regarding the defendant's ownership and the property in question.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Office copy of Lawyer’s Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document shows that the plaintiff formally requested the defendant to fulfill the agreement.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document provides evidence of the communication sent to the defendant regarding the fulfillment of the agreement.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document serves as proof of the defendant's receipt of the lawyer's notice.
Reference:
Ext.A6

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Rajeev vs Biju regarding specific performance
Case Code Year
Case between Rajeev vs Biju regarding specific performance

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque issued towards legally enforceable debt

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Sat, 07/20/2024 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Vijayendran, Chithra vs Yamunadevi regarding review of order
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Navasudeen.S vs Sira Group regarding review of an earlier order
Court of the Munsiff, Kollam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sajeev vs T.Unnikrishna Pillai regarding setting aside an exparte decree.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Gopakumar vs K.S.Abdul Manaf regarding Realisation of Money
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM.
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Bank of India vs Shibina. S et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won