Case Summary
The complainant, Radhakrishnan Nair, alleged that the accused, Smt. Sreelatha, borrowed money and issued a cheque that was dishonored. Despite multiple opportunities, the complainant failed to appear in court to present evidence.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Criminal Case
Final Judgment
No
The complaint was dismissed as the complainant failed to appear for multiple hearings. The accused was acquitted and set at liberty.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
In the result: The complaint is dismissed under section 256 (1) of Cr.P.C. and resultantly the accused is acquitted.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Radhakrishnan Nair
- Party Age
- 60
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Smt. Sreelatha
- Party Age
- 43
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- D. Baiju Kumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. T.S. Sreekumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The complaint filed under section 138 of the NI Act was dismissed.
Evidence:
The complaint is dismissed under section 256 (1) of Cr.P.C. and resultantly the accused is acquitted.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Criminal Case
Category
Cheque Bounce Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Cheque dishonour
Case Code
ST.NO.
Case Code Year
2023
Case Flags
Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 N.I. Act