Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No. 988/2016

Case between Radha vs Sujatha, Anil Kumar regarding Injunction

Court
The Court of the Munsiff, Kollam
Judge
Smt. Ragi.S.
Order Date
2025-02-11
Duration
Case Closed
Tue, 02/11/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Radha filed a suit for Injunction against Sujatha and Anil Kumar. The court allowed the plaintiff to withdraw the suit with liberty to institute a fresh suit.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The plaintiff was allowed to withdraw the suit with permission to file a new one on the same matter.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Plaintiff is allowed to withdraw the suit with liberty to institute a fresh suit.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The plaintiff was allowed to withdraw the suit with permission to file a new one on the same matter.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court permitted the withdrawal of the suit, allowing the plaintiff to file a fresh suit.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court permitted the withdrawal of the suit, allowing the plaintiff to file a fresh suit.
Supporting Evidence
The court permitted the withdrawal of the suit, allowing the plaintiff to file a fresh suit.

Judgment Evidence:

IA.3/25 allowed. Plaintiff is allowed to withdraw the suit with liberty to institute a fresh suit in respect of the subject matter of the suit.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Radha
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sujatha
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Anil Kumar
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
S.Sivaraj
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
D.Ushakumari
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Saraswathy.K.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
P.Deepa
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
A.Sudheerbose
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is allowed to withdraw the suit with liberty to institute a fresh suit in respect of the subject matter of the suit.
Evidence:
IA.3/25 allowed. Plaintiff is allowed to withdraw the suit with liberty to institute a fresh suit in respect of the subject matter of the suit (VSO).

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Radha vs Sujatha, Anil Kumar regarding Injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Radha vs Sujatha, Anil Kumar regarding Injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Fri, 01/01/2016 - 12:00
Case Closed
Tue, 02/11/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 02/28/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Vijayendran, Chithra vs Yamunadevi regarding review of order
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Navasudeen.S vs Sira Group regarding review of an earlier order
Court of the Munsiff, Kollam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sajeev vs T.Unnikrishna Pillai regarding setting aside an exparte decree.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Gopakumar vs K.S.Abdul Manaf regarding Realisation of Money
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM.
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Bank of India vs Shibina. S et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won