Case Summary
Rachel Mathew and Anish Thomas Mathew filed a rent control petition against M/s. Vrudhi Home Fresh regarding the need for possession of a rental property. The parties reached a settlement during mediation.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The petition was allowed based on the terms of a mediation agreement. The respondent is directed to vacate the premises and hand over possession to the petitioners.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found that the parties entered into a lawful settlement regarding the need for possession.
The court found that the parties entered into a lawful settlement regarding the need for possession.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found that the parties entered into a lawful settlement regarding the need for possession.
The court found that the parties entered into a lawful settlement regarding the need for possession.
Supporting Evidence
The court is satisfied under Section 11(10) of the Act and accordingly a final order in terms of the compromise can be passed based on the admission of the parties.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the rent control petition is allowed under section 11(3) of the Act as follows: The respondent is hereby directed to put the petitioners in possession of the petition schedule building forthwith.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Rachel Mathew
- Party Age
- 67
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Anish Thomas Mathew
- Party Age
- 38
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- M/s. Vrudhi Home Fresh
- Party Age
- 49
- Relation
- Represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Memorandum of Agreement dated 07.02.2025
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Adv. Jijo Thomas
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Adv.Aneesh James
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Adv.M.D. Beena
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Adv.Neha Vijay
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Advs. L.K. Nasseer
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sudheer K.K
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Possession
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The respondent is directed to put the petitioners in possession of the petition schedule building forthwith.
Evidence:
In the result, the rent control petition is allowed under section 11(3) of the Act as follows: The respondent is hereby directed to put the petitioners in possession of the petition schedule building forthwith.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Memorandum of Agreement
Submitted By:
Unknown
Relevance:
This document outlines the settlement terms agreed upon by the parties during mediation.
Reference:
null
Document Type:
Mediation Report
Submitted By:
Unknown
Relevance:
This report accompanies the Memorandum of Agreement and confirms the settlement reached by the parties.
Reference:
null
Document Type:
Rent Control Petition
Submitted By:
Unknown
Relevance:
This is the main petition filed under the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act regarding the tenancy dispute.
Reference:
R.C.P. No. 133/2023
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Rachel Mathew et al vs M/s. Vrudhi Home Fresh regarding Rent control petition
Case Code Year
Case between Rachel Mathew et al vs M/s. Vrudhi Home Fresh regarding Rent control petition
Case Flags
Adalath Resolved
Out-of-Court Settlement