Case Summary
The case involves petitioners Rachel Mathew and Anish Thomas Mathew seeking possession of a property from the respondent, M/s. Vrudhi Home Fresh, through a rent control petition. The parties have reached a mediation settlement regarding the matter.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Possession of the petition schedule building.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the rent control petition, directing the respondents to vacate the premises and hand over possession to the petitioners. If they fail to do so, the petitioners can execute the order through the court.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The respondents admitted the bonafide need of the petitioners.
The respondents admitted the bonafide need of the petitioners.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The respondents admitted the bonafide need of the petitioners.
The respondents admitted the bonafide need of the petitioners.
Supporting Evidence
The respondent has admitted the bonafide need of the petitioners.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the rent control petition is allowed under section 11(3) of the Act as follows: 1.The respondent is hereby directed to put the petitioners in possession of the petition schedule building forthwith, failing which the petitioners are at liberty to execute it through the process of court.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Rachel Mathew
- Party Age
- 67
- Relation
- W/o. late Varghese Mathew
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Anish Thomas Mathew
- Party Age
- 38
- Relation
- S/o. late Varghese Mathew
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- M/s. Vrudhi Home Fresh
- Party Age
- 49
- Relation
- Represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Memorandum of Agreement dated 07.02.2025.
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Adv. Jijo Thomas
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Adv.Aneesh James
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Adv.M.D. Beena
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Adv.Neha Vijay
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Advs. L.K. Nasseer
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sudheer K.K
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Possession
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The respondent is hereby directed to put the petitioners in possession of the petition schedule building forthwith.
Evidence:
In the result, the rent control petition is allowed under section 11(3) of the Act as follows: 1.The respondent is hereby directed to put the petitioners in possession of the petition schedule building forthwith, failing which the petitioners are at liberty to execute it through the process of court.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Bonafide need
Case Code
Case between Rachel Mathew et al vs M/s. Vrudhi Home Fresh regarding rent control petition.
Case Code Year
Case between Rachel Mathew et al vs M/s. Vrudhi Home Fresh regarding rent control petition.
Case Flags
Adalath Resolved
Out-of-Court Settlement