Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
R.C.P. No. 187/2020

Case between P.U.Sidhique vs Zakariya regarding Rent Control

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2024-11-07
Duration
approximately-4 years 0 days

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioners, P.U.Sidhique and P.H.Subaidha, filed a rent control petition against the respondent, Zakariya, due to non-compliance with a previous order regarding rent arrears. The court has determined that the respondent failed to show sufficient cause for not complying with the order.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court found that the respondent did not comply with the prior order regarding rent arrears. Consequently, an order was issued to stop the proceedings and put the petitioner in possession of the building.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Respondent directed to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The respondent failed to comply with the order and did not show sufficient cause for non-compliance.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence an order is passed under section 12(3) of the act stopping all the further proceedings in the rent control petition and directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

P.U.Sidhique (76 years) Papputathu house, Krishnaswami Road, Pullepadi, Ernakulam Village, Kanayannur Thaluk, Kochi-682031 P.H.Subaidha (69 years) Papputathu house, Krishnaswami Road, Pullepadi, Ernakulam village, Kanavannur Thaluk, Kochi-682031

Defendants

Zakariya (54 years) Ayyaril House V.K.Bava Lane SRM Road, Ernakulam, Cochin-682018, Ernakulam village, Kanayannur Thaluk

Reliefs

Relief Type: Possession
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.
Evidence:
Hence an order is passed under section 12(3) of the act stopping all the further proceedings in the rent control petition and directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Wed, 01/01/2020 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases