Case Summary
The plaintiff, P.S. Salahudheen, filed a suit against the Greater Cochin Development Authority. The matter was settled in terms of compromise.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Refund of half court fees paid
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit has been decreed in terms of compromise and the plaintiff is entitled to a refund of half the court fees paid.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The terms of the compromise are lawful.
The terms of the compromise are lawful.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The terms of the compromise are lawful.
The terms of the compromise are lawful.
Supporting Evidence
Heard. Satisfied that the terms of compromise are lawful.
Judgment Evidence:
Suit decreed in terms of compromise. Compromise shall form part of decree.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- P.S. Salahudheen
- Party Age
- 65
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Greater Cochin Development Authority
- Relation
- Represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- P.A. Abdul Jabbar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- D.M. Sajeevan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Suit decreed in terms of compromise with refund of ½ Court fees paid.
Evidence:
Suit decreed in terms of compromise. Compromise shall form part of decree. Plaintiff entitled for refund of ½ Court fees paid.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Settlement and Mediation
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
O.S.NO.
Case Code Year
2018
Case Flags
Out-of-Court Settlement