Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 167/2023

Case between Indian Overseas Bank vs Mohammed Mavadigothi regarding realization of money.

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Reeja R. Nair
Order Date
2025-08-01
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Indian Overseas Bank, filed a suit against the defendant, Mohammed Mavadigothi, for recovery of dues related to a vehicle loan. The defendant defaulted on the loan repayments despite multiple reminders from the bank.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed that the plaintiff is entitled to recover a sum of Rs.8,35,257.20 from the defendant along with interest and costs. The defendant failed to make repayments as agreed.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.8,35,257.20 from the defendant and from his assets.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed that the plaintiff is entitled to recover a sum of Rs.8,35,257.20 from the defendant along with interest and costs. The defendant failed to make repayments as agreed.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff's case was established through unrebutted evidence and documentation showing the default on loan repayments.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff's case was established through unrebutted evidence and documentation showing the default on loan repayments.
Supporting Evidence
The unrebutted oral testimony of PW1 and Exts.A1 to A6 established the case as pleaded by the plaintiff. It shows that the plaint claim remains unpaid till date.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed as follows; Plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.8,35,257.20 from the defendant and from his assets.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Indian Overseas Bank
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mohammed Mavadigothi
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Original credit sanction advice, Original deed of Hypothecation, Original demand promissory note, Original letter of undertaking, Copy of demand notice, Copy of the statement of accounts.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K.P. Suresh Kumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Keerthi K. Narayanan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Shalu S.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Aswin B.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.8,35,257.20 from the defendant.
Evidence:
In the result, suit is decreed as follows; Plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.8,35,257.20/- from the defendant and from his assets.
Relief Type: Interest
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to realize interest at 12% per annum on the amount from the date of suit till date of decree.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is entitled to realize interest @ 12% per annum for Rs.8,35,257.20/- from the date of suit till date decree from the defendant and from his assets.
Relief Type: Interest
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to realize interest at 6% per annum from the date of decree till realization.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is entitled to realize interest @ 6% per annum for Rs.8,35,257.20/- from date of decree till date of realization from the defendant and from his assets.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to recover costs of the suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is entitled to realize costs of the suit from defendant and from his assets.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Credit Sanction Advice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document shows the details of the loan sanctioned by the bank.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Deed of Hypothecation
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document evidences the hypothecation of the vehicle purchased with the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Demand Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This is the promissory note executed by the defendant for the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Letter of undertaking
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document represents the undertaking given by the defendant regarding the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Demand Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This notice was issued to the defendant under Section 13(2) of the SARFAESI Act demanding repayment.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Bank statement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This is the statement of accounts relating to the vehicle loan which evidences the outstanding dues.
Reference:
Ext.A6

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between Indian Overseas Bank vs Mohammed Mavadigothi regarding realization of money.
Case Code Year
Case between Indian Overseas Bank vs Mohammed Mavadigothi regarding realization of money.

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam, Kerala State
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Fri, 08/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Government

Similar Cases

Case between Indian Overseas Bank vs Nithin Nath.T.V regarding realisation of money
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between State Bank of India vs Mr. Michael Joseph regarding realization of Money
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Maker Village, Kerala Technology and Infrastructure Zone, Kinfra Hi Tech park, Kalamassery vs M/s Wahoo Technologies private limited et al regarding recovery of money.
I Additional Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Punjab National Bank vs M/s Cafe Diaries et al regarding realization of money
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between State Bank of India, Ernakulam Branch represented by its Chief Manager, Jayesh P vs Thereesa et al regarding realization of money
THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won