OS. No.601/2019

Case between Priya vs Sakunthala et al regarding Declaration and Injunction

Court

COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM

Judge

Smt. Ragi.S.

Order Date

2025-01-31

Duration

Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This suit is filed by the plaintiff under Section 26 Order VII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure for Declaration and Injunction. The plaintiff was absent during the hearing.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Civil Suit

Final Judgment

The plaint was rejected due to the absence of the plaintiff and non-remittance of balance court fee.

Key Reasoning:
The court found that the plaintiff was absent and did not remit the balance court fee.

Why Defendant Won:
The court found that the plaintiff was absent and did not remit the balance court fee.

Supporting Evidence

The plaintiff was absent during the hearing and the balance court fee was not remitted.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence plaint rejected u/o 7 Rule 11(c) of Civil Procedure Code.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Priya
Party Age: 36
Relation: D/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Sakunthala
Party Age: 45
Relation: W/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Surendran Pillai
Party Age: 50

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: P.Deepa
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: I.Stevenson
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: V.Moti
Appearance Type: Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction

Outcome: Rejected

Description:

The plaint for declaration and injunction was rejected due to balance court fee not being remitted.

Evidence: