Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
Restor.Ptn/956/2015

Case between Preman vs Haridasan et al regarding setting aside decree

Court
Court of Munsiff Magistrate
Judge
Sri. Sanu C, B.sc, LLM
Order Date
2015-07-17
Duration
0 years, 3 months, 25 days
Case Closed
Fri, 07/17/2015 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Preman filed a restoration petition against Haridasan and multiple respondents requesting to set aside a decree dated 24-2-2015.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The petition filed by Preman is allowed, and the decree dated 24-2-2015 is set aside.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Setting aside the decree
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Final Judgment
No
The petition filed by Preman is allowed, and the decree dated 24-2-2015 is set aside.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Not mentioned

Judgment Evidence:

Cost paid . Petition allowed . Decree dated 24-2-2015 is set aside vide order in IA 956/15.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Preman
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Haridasan
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Velayudhan
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rajan
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Anitha
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sailaja
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ammini
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Usha
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sheeba
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Beena
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Vinod
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Vinesh
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ammini
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sandya
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sabitha
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sanoop
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Soumya
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Baby
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Prameela
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Prajith Kumar
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Pradeep
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Prasanth
Plaintiffs Documents
Decree dated 24-2-2015
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned

Advocates

Party Role
Petitioner
Advocate Name
M.A.M.Rafeek
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Respondent
Advocate Name
P.Viswanathan
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Setting aside Decree
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Setting aside the decree dated 24-2-2015
Evidence:
Cost paid . Petition allowed . Decree dated 24-2-2015 is set aside vide order in IA 956/15.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Restoration Petition
Category
Case Restoration and Delays
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Preman vs Haridasan et al regarding setting aside decree
Case Code Year
Case between Preman vs Haridasan et al regarding setting aside decree

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur, Malappuram
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Mon, 03/23/2015 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 07/17/2015 - 12:00
From
Wed, 07/01/2015 - 12:00
To
Fri, 07/31/2015 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Kolangara Kumaran et al vs Haridasan et al regarding restoration petition
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Restoration Petition Unknown
Case between Achuthan vs Kali et al regarding restoration petition
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Restoration Petition Defendant Won
Case between Kunheevi vs Puthiyakath Kinattingal Ramlath et al regarding restoration petition
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Restoration Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Kalarikkal Muhammedkutty vs Kalarikkal Kunhimon regarding restoration petition
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Restoration Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between T.Vijayakumar Takur Sing Sett vs Thekkumpurath Sulaikha regarding restoration
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Restoration Petition Plaintiff Won