Case Summary
The petitioner Poorani, represented by her Power of Attorney Holder, filed a petition against the respondent James K V for non-compliance of a rent control order. The court found that the respondent failed to comply with the order and had not shown any cause for default.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Petitioner is directed to be put in possession of the building within 30 days.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court ordered the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building due to the respondent's failure to comply with the prior order.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The respondent failed to comply with the court's order.
The respondent failed to comply with the court's order.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The respondent failed to comply with the court's order.
The respondent failed to comply with the court's order.
Supporting Evidence
In the instant case, more than one and half months have elapsed after the order has been passed. So far respondent did not complied or show cause.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence an order is passed under Section 12(3) of the act stopping all the further proceedings in the rent control petition and directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building within 30 days from today.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Poorani
- Party Age
- 55
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Dr. Sankaranarayanan S.
- Party Age
- 62
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- James K V
- Party Age
- 44
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Affidavit of noncompliance of the said order by the respondent.
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- P. Sathisan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Krishna G. Nath
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sindhya A.K.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Dona Augustine
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Athul Rajesh
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Possession
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The court directed the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building.
Evidence:
Hence an order is passed under Section 12(3) of the act stopping all the further proceedings in the rent control petition and directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building within 30 days from today.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Poorani vs James K V regarding compliance of rent control order.
Case Code Year
Case between Poorani vs James K V regarding compliance of rent control order.