Case Summary
Payyoormana Devaswam Trust represented by Managing Trustee filed suit seeking injunction, dismissed due to lack of instruction.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Not Decided
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The suit for injunction was dismissed with costs due to the counsel for the plaintiff reporting a lack of instruction from the client.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Not available
Judgment Evidence:
Suit for injunction. Counsel for plaintiff reported that he has no instruction from his client. Hence suit is dismissed with costs.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Payyoormana Devaswam Trust
- Relation
- Managing Trustee of Payyoor Manakkal Subrahmanian Namboothirippad
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Kunhippa
- Party Age
- 43
- Relation
- S/o. Thenutty
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Abdu Haji
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- S/o. Thenutty
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Nafeesa
- Party Age
- 45
- Relation
- D/o. Theutty
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.M. VijayaKumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Gopikadavath
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. M.P. Hussain
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Injunction sought by the plaintiff
Evidence:
Not mentioned
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Category
Injunction and Access Rights
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Payyoormana Devaswam Trust vs Kunhippa et al regarding injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Payyoormana Devaswam Trust vs Kunhippa et al regarding injunction