Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
R.C.P. No. 111/2021

Case between Paul Varghese vs Krishnakumar T.M. regarding eviction

Court
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
Sri. Reghunath N.S.
Order Date
2024-02-23
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioner Paul Varghese filed a petition for eviction against the respondent Krishnakumar T.M. Both parties were represented in court, and the petitioner indicated that they had obtained vacant possession of the property.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The petition was closed after the petitioner confirmed that they had obtained vacant possession.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner successfully demonstrated they had obtained vacant possession of the property.

Judgment Evidence:

In the light of above submission, the petition is closed. No costs.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Paul Varghese (68 years years) Flat No. 4E, Express Estate, Kaloor, Kadavanthra Road, Cochin-17

Defendants

Krishnakumar T.M. (36 years years) Thamarassery House, Gandhi Nagar, Kureekadu P.O, Thripunithura

Reliefs

Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Petition can be closed as vacant possession of the property was obtained.
Evidence:
Counsel for petitioner submitted that she got vacant possession of the petition schedule property and therefore, petition can be closed.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases