Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
R.C.P. No. 111/2021

Case between Paul Varghese vs Krishnakumar T.M. regarding eviction

Court
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
Sri. Reghunath N.S.
Order Date
2024-02-23
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioner Paul Varghese filed a petition for eviction against the respondent Krishnakumar T.M. Both parties were represented in court, and the petitioner indicated that they had obtained vacant possession of the property.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The petition was closed after the petitioner confirmed that they had obtained vacant possession.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The petition was closed after the petitioner confirmed that they had obtained vacant possession.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner successfully demonstrated they had obtained vacant possession of the property.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The petitioner successfully demonstrated they had obtained vacant possession of the property.
Supporting Evidence
The petitioner submitted that she got vacant possession of the petition schedule property.

Judgment Evidence:

In the light of above submission, the petition is closed. No costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Paul Varghese
Party Age
68
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Krishnakumar T.M.
Party Age
36
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Vakalath, Rent Control Petition
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Biju Abraham
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Lilia John
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Lakshmi Mohan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Asha B. Mathens
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Kabil Chandran T.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Petition can be closed as vacant possession of the property was obtained.
Evidence:
Counsel for petitioner submitted that she got vacant possession of the petition schedule property and therefore, petition can be closed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Paul Varghese vs Krishnakumar T.M. regarding eviction
Case Code Year
Case between Paul Varghese vs Krishnakumar T.M. regarding eviction

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Thu, 02/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Thu, 02/29/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between N.X. Joseph Jason vs Noble George regarding eviction and rent fixation
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between P.B Gopalakrishnan vs Ms. Dilshana Siyad regarding Rent Control Petition
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Keecheri Sree Rama Varma Kerala Pattarya Samajam vs P.U. Rameshan regarding rent control compliance
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Dr. M.N Subramanian et al vs M/s Jigucheon Pvt Ltd et al regarding Rent Control Petition
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Hameed et al vs Shamsudheen et al regarding Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control)Act, 1965
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Rent Control Petition Unknown