Case Summary
Three plaintiffs filed a suit for injunction against multiple defendants. The suit was dismissed for default due to plaintiff's absence.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Unknown
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiff.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Suit for injunction. Plaintiff's counsel reported that he has no instruction from his client. Name of plaintiff is called. Absent. No representation. Hence suit is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Pathumma
- Party Age
- 48
- Relation
- W/o. Machincheri Thoombil Moiduhaji
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Jameela
- Party Age
- 33
- Relation
- D/o. Adiyattil Aboobacker @ Bava
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Hamza
- Party Age
- 49
- Relation
- S/o. Adiyattil Aboobacker @ Bava
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sajna
- Party Age
- 31
- Relation
- D/o. Ayappalli Koya
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Iyyathumma
- Party Age
- 60
- Relation
- W/o. Ayappalli Koya
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Selvi
- Party Age
- 35
- Relation
- D/o. Ayappalli Koya
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Shabeeb
- Party Age
- 19
- Relation
- S/o. Ayappalli Koya
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Muhammed
- Party Age
- 60
- Relation
- S/o. Ayappalli Marakkarutty
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sajla
- Party Age
- 24
- Relation
- W/o. Saifudheen
Plaintiffs Documents
Unknown
Defendants Documents
Unknown
Advocates
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Category
Injunction and Access Rights
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Pathumma et al vs Sajna et al regarding injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Pathumma et al vs Sajna et al regarding injunction